Apex court affirms Rewcastle Brown, two others defamed Sultanah
Published on: Tuesday, September 10, 2024
By:
FMT, V Anbalagan
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has maintained a Court of Appeal ruling that Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle Brown and two others are liable to Terengganu’s Sultanah Nur Zahirah for defamation.
This follows the refusal of a three-member bench to allow Rewcastle Brown, publisher Chong Ton Sin and printer Vinlin Press Sdn Bhd leave to appeal based on four legal questions posed for determination by the apex court.
ADVERTISEMENT Bench chairman Nallini Pathmanathan said none of the questions framed met the threshold requirements of novelty and public importance as required under Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964.
The judge acknowledged that Rewcastle Brown’s book, The Sarawak Report: The Inside Story of the 1MDB Expose, formed an important basis for the 1MDB expose and said its significance cannot be underplayed.
However, it did not, and cannot, provide immunity to the author where there is defamation of a third party, she added.
"The respondent (the sultanah) is entitled to equal treatment at law. The fact that she is a member of a royal family does not preclude her from bringing a claim and being treated as any member of the public,"Nalini added.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nallini said, even if leave was granted, the appeal had slim prospects of success.
The court awarded the sultanah RM15,000 in costs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Also on the panel hearing the application were Justices Zabariah Yusof and Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera.
On Dec 12 last year, a three-member Court of Appeal bench ordered the trio to pay the sultanah RM300,000 in damages jointly and severally, as well as RM120,000 in costs.
Justice Azahari Kamal Ramli, who delivered the unanimous decision of the appeals court said the trial judge had erred in dismissing the suit in 2022.
The sultanah initiated the RM300 million defamation suit in 2018, claiming that Rewcastle Brown had disparaged her in the book, which tells the story of Sarawak Report’s investigation into the 1MDB scandal.
She claimed the statement suggested that she was involved in corrupt practices, had interfered in Terengganu’s administration and had used her status to influence the establishment of the Terengganu Investment Authority (TIA), as 1MDB was earlier known.
She further claimed that the statement could be construed to mean that she had helped Low Taek Jho (better known as Jho Low) secure his position as adviser to TIA.
In her defence, Rewcastle Brown claimed that she had made an honest mistake in identifying the key player in the impugned statement as the wife of the sultan. She claimed that she should have referred to the sultan’s sister instead.
Lawyer A Vishnu Kumar, appeared for the sultanah, while counsel Americk Sidhu represented the applicants.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express’s Telegram channel.
Daily Express Malaysia
* Follow us on Instagram and join our Telegram and/or WhatsApp channel(s) for the latest news you don't want to miss.
* Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.