Advertisement
SPONSORED CONTENT
Cosmobeauté Malaysia and beautyexpo will expand into East Malaysia with the launch of the Cosmobeauté Malaysia Borneo Festival 2026 at the Sabah International Convention Centre (SICC) from May 25 to 26.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Lahad Datu conflict ended on April 10, 2013 with 56 Sulu militants, 10 Malaysian security officers and six civilians killed. (File pic)
Who is funding the eight Sulu claimants’ multi-country activities? After the UK government in 2017 rejected their request for arbitration due to reasons such as their identity being unclear, the eight claimants pursued the arbitration which started out in Spain before moving it to France, after Spanish courts ordered the arbitration to stop. The arbitration award stated that the Sulu claimants spent more than US$3.5 million on fees and costs for their lawyers in UK, Spain, and the Philippines and fees for experts, and US$2.3 million for the arbitrator Gonzalo Stampa’s fees and over US$13,000 for the arbitration costs. The eight Sulu claimants were last year reported to have used the services of at least five different law firms in the Philippines, UK, Spain, France, and Luxembourg, and have been making attempts to seize assets belonging to Malaysia or Malaysian entities in Luxembourg, France, and the Netherlands to enforce the US$14.92 billion arbitration award. The Malaysian government’s website says the eight Sulu claimants are being financed by the “deep pockets” of the company Therium, which operates by investing in cases and then makes profits when the case succeeds. While saying that it is unknown if the litigation fund Therium is providing financial support directly to the eight claimants, the Malaysian government said the company’s bankrolling of the Sulu claimants include paying for their lawyers in Manila and London. “It is unclear as to whether Therium, or the claimant’s legal advisors, have undertaken due diligence into the true identity of Sulu claimants and their connections to the so-called Sulu Sultanate. “It has been reported that Therium has already sunk over $10 million into the claim, and will be hoping to extract from the Government of Malaysia millions of dollars,” the Malaysian government’s website says. Who will benefit from the US$14.92 billion arbitration award? “The beneficiaries would be the eight individual claimants and the litigation fund, Therium, that is backing them. “It would see the claimants become extremely wealthy individuals, to the detriment of the Malaysian people – with the award equivalent to 16 per cent of Malaysia’s yearly budget. The Government of Malaysia is therefore determined to fight the award to prevent any form of compensation from reaching them,” the Malaysian government’s website says. On Wednesday, minister in charge of law and institutional reform Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said the nearly US$15 billion award equivalent to RM63 billion was the second-highest award in arbitration history, and said the Sulu claimants had been twisting history and making false statements and intend to threaten Malaysia into paying the money to them. But Azalina said the Sulu claimants’ claim was invalid and described it as an attempt by “foreigners financed by a litigation fund which is threatening a sovereign nation by misusing the international commercial arbitration process”, stating Malaysia’s firm rejection of the arbitrator and the award as invalid and also that Malaysia does not recognise the eight Sulu claimants as the legitimate heirs of Sultan Jamalul Kiram II. Malaysia’s position is that international arbitration should not be used to decide the case as there was no arbitration clause in the 1878 agreement and that the case should be decided in Malaysian courts. While the eight claimants insist the Sulu Sultanate had only leased the land in Sabah and want to be compensated based on Sabah’s total economic output, Malaysia said the correct translation of the 1878 agreement was that the so-called Sulu sultan had given away the land to the British. “In fact, the so-called Sultan of Sulu only controlled a very small portion of Sabah, and there can be no legitimate claim to the entire output of Sabah,” the Malaysian government’s website said. The Malaysian government also said it has never recognised the legitimacy of the “so-called” Sulu sultanate, and noted that the people of Sabah had exercised their right to self-determination and chose to have Sabah be part of Malaysia’s formation in 1963. As “Therium and eight mysterious individuals seek to line their pockets at the expense of the Malaysian people” by seeking to enforce the US$14.92 billion arbitration award, the Malaysian government had taken legal action to stop or suspend their efforts to seize overseas assets linked to Malaysia and will continue to protect its assets from seizure. “The Government of Malaysia refuses to be held to ransom,” it said on its website. The Malaysian government has also gone to the courts abroad to overturn the arbitration award and to have the appointment of the arbitrator invalidated. On the website, the Malaysian government also assured international investors by saying the Sulu claim has no bearing on the country’s attractiveness as a leading destination for foreign investment, and instead demonstrates the government’s commitment to ensure international arbitration processes are not abused. For more on the history of the case and details on the arbitration, read here for Malay Mail’s summary: 10 things about: How the alleged Sulu heirs got a US$14.9 billion order against Malaysia and also go to the Malaysian government’s website.





