Sat, 13 Jun 2026
Headlines:
Court throws out defamation suit over ‘nasi kandar shakedown’ article
Published on: Tuesday, May 06, 2025
Published on: Tue, May 06, 2025
By: Predeep Nambiar, FMT
Text Size:
Text:
Court throws out defamation suit over ‘nasi kandar shakedown’ article
The High Court dismissed a defamation suit brought by Pertiga president Sabaruddin Ahmad against The Star and journalist Imran Tawfik Hilmy over a news report, published in October 2020, with costs of RM30,000.
GEORGE TOWN: The High Court here has thrown out a defamation suit filed by Pertiga president Sabaruddin Ahmad against The Star and its journalist Imran Tawfik Hilmy, ruling that the impugned article was written responsibly and in public interest.

Justice Rozana Ali Yusoff said the article, headlined “Nasi Kandar Shakedown: Penang restaurant claims they are being harassed for protection money”, was protected by qualified privilege.

Advertisement
The defence of qualified privilege enables journalists to report on important issues – especially those involving matters of public interest – if they do it fairly, carefully, and without ill intent.

The case began on Oct 14, 2020, when a nasi kandar restaurant owner lodged a police report claiming extortion linked to threats to poison food. Sabaruddin was arrested at a hotel two days later and remanded for two days.

SPONSORED CONTENT
Cosmobeauté Malaysia and beautyexpo will expand into East Malaysia with the launch of the Cosmobeauté Malaysia Borneo Festival 2026 at the Sabah International Convention Centre (SICC) from May 25 to 26.
On the day of the arrest, The Star published the impugned article after interviewing the restaurant owner and his son, reporting that a criminal probe was ongoing.

Sabaruddin was released on Oct 18.

Advertisement
The police later concluded that there was no offence or credible evidence, and closed the case on Dec 21, 2020, court filings show.

Sabaruddin then filed a defamation suit against the nasi kandar restaurant owner, Syed Ibrahim NMA Abdul Sukoor, The Star and Imran.

Advertisement
Justice Rozana, ruling in favour of The Star and Imran, found the article to be factually accurate.

She said the newspaper had correctly reported that a police report had been lodged, and that the matter was under investigation.

Rozana said the issue involved public health and safety, and that given the popularity of the restaurant, both the reporter and publisher had a duty to report the matter.

She also held that the plaintiff had failed to prove that they acted maliciously or that he had suffered reputational harm.

The court awarded an overall sum of RM30,000 in costs to The Star and Imran.

In 2022, a separate judgment was entered against Syed Ibrahim for filing a false report, with damages of RM50,000 and costs of RM10,000 awarded to Sabaruddin.

Lawyers Nicholas Navaron and Soraya Sulaiman Ong appeared for The Star and Imran, while S Raveentharan represented Sabaruddin.
* Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates!

* Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Advertisement
Share this story
Advertisement
Advertisement
Follow Us  
           
Daily Express News  
© Copyright 2026 Sabah Publishing House Sdn. Bhd. (Co. No. 35782-P)
close
Try 1 month for RM 18.00
Already a subscriber? Login here
Try 1 month for RM 18.00
open
Try 1 month for RM 18.00
Already a subscriber? Login here